Journal of AI, Software & Web Technologies logo
Article

Metabolomics Insight into PN01 and SA02: Anticancer Efficacy and Antidiabetic Enzyme Inhibition

Syeda Tayyaba Asif1★, Mohtasheem Ul Hassan1, Shah Ali Ul Qader2, Madiha Jamshed1★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Karachi, Karachi, PAKISTAN.
  2. 2Department of Biochemistry, University of Karachi, Karachi, PAKISTAN.

CORRESPONDENCE

Syeda Tayyaba Asif

Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Karachi, KU, 75270, Karachi, PAKISTAN.

tayyaba8@yahoo.com

Received: 15-05-2026; Revised: 24-07-2026; Accepted: 02-09-2026.

Volume 1, Issue 1 · pp. 319–328 · PUBLISHED Jan-Mar 2026 · DOI: 10.5530/pres.20270197

ABSTRACT

Background Cancer is a major global health problem, with nearly 10 million deaths recorded in 2020. Approximately 30% of cancers in low- and lower-middle-income nations stem from infectious agents like Human Papillomavirus (HPV). Cervical Cancer (CC03) and HPV is now current issue all over the world especially Pakistani,breast cancer (BC04) and Colorectal Cancer (CRC05) are alarmingly common, while Pancreatic Cancer (PC06) is less frequent but has a high mortality rate. Diabetes also has highest prevalence rate globally, glucoamylase enzyme inhibition has reportedly providing a novel way in management of diabetes. Purpose Regular consumption of spices in an appropriate amount has been linked to reduce a death rate from chronic disorders. Materials and Methods Identification of phytochemicals of commonly used spices named; Piper nigrum L., (PN01) and Syzygium aromaticum (SA02) by GCMS and study their role in multiple cancer. Assay of glucoamylase enzyme inhibitory potential of PN01 and SA02 for diabetes management. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to find out the glucoamylase inhibitory potential of PN01 and SA02 at different parameters such as pH, temperature, time interval and days, which was carried out by using glucoxidase kit method. Statistical analysis was done by two-way ANOVA. For this purpose, phosphate buffer solution of PN01 and SA02 were used. Results Total 16 bioactive active compounds were found during GC-MS scanning of methanol PN01 fruits extract wherein major are caryophylline, d-limonene, piperine, α-pinene, copaene and α-caryophylline. Total 14 secondary metabolites identified in SA02 dried flower buds extract included eugenol (100%), caryophylline (31.39%), and phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl), acetate (23.76%), PN01 showed maximum glucoamylase inhibition at 60 min, (91.59±0.99), day 3 (89.94±1.23), 37ºC temperature (72.71±6.76) and at pH 5 (65.60 ± 4.56), while SA02 exerted significant glucoamylase inhibition at 37ºC (96.05±1.27), 60 min (92.39±2.52) and day 3(91.36±4.39). Conclusion The present study showed that PN01 and SA02 phytochemicals identified by GCMS are valuable for multiple cancer treatment. This study also provides the direct evidence that PN01 and SA02 extracts have great inhibitory potential of glucoamylase enzyme so; by using these ideal conditions it will be helpful in diabetes and obesity management.

KEYWORDS

0% READ

Text

FULL TEXT

INTRODUCTION

Cancer, a disease marked by the uncontrolled multiplication of cells, is a most prevalent cause of death internationally. Cancer is not a single disease, but a group of over 100 diseases, typically classified by the organ or tissue where the cancer originated. Currently, cancer is treated through a variety of methods, combining conventional approaches like surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy with more modern or targeted therapies such as hormone therapy, immunotherapy and nano therapy (Madihalli et al., 2022). The global increase in chronic diseases poses a significant challenge and rising health care costs are driving increased research interest. Various food items provide the public with various health benefits due to their secondary metabolites including reduced cancer risk (Christine et al., 2008).

In Pakistan, the annual age-standardized CC03 incidence rate is 5.4/100,000 women, with an estimated 4,762 new cases in 2023, and a mortality rate of 3.6/100,000 women from 3,069 deaths in the same year. CC03 is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer among women in Pakistan and the second most common in the 15-44 age groups, with the HPV being the primary cause (Singh et al., 2023). A virus infects cervical cells, where it’s E6 and E7 proteins block the normal function of p53 and pRB. This allows the cells to grow out of control, leading to abnormal cell changes known as dysplasia. Cervical dysplasia can progress slowly over many years into Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) and eventually invasive CC03 (Haiyan et al., 2016). BC04 is the most frequent type of cancer among women, in 103 out of 154 countries, cancer is the leading cause of death. In 2018, a total of 2.1 million new breast cancer cases were diagnosed, which accounted for 2.24% of all new cancer cases. The mortality rate for breast cancer was approximately 15.00% (Bray et al., 2018). CRC05’s global impact is shifting, while historically concentrated in developed nations, its incidence is growing in developing countries and the overall burden is expected to rise with population aging and the spread of "westernized" lifestyles, such as changes in diet and physical activity (Pasqualino et al., 2016). Worldwide, PC06 ranked as the 12th most frequent cancer which is also responsible for the 7th most cancer deaths (Junjie et al., 2021).

Diabetes is chronic metabolic disorder characterized by increased blood sugar level and inadequate insulin release. Type 1 diabetes is due to autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells while type 2 characterized by insulin resistance and progressive beta cell dysfunction. In diabetes, amylase and glucoamylase are responsible for carbohydrate breakdown into simple sugar which then absorbed through wall of small intestine into the blood stream which directly influence in blood sugar level. Inactivation of glucoamylase enzymes contributes to postpartum hyperglycemia in diabetic patients. Therapeutically available antidiabetic medicines exert their medicinal effect through various mechanisms such as elevation of insulin secretion, glucose absorption, and metabolism. Glucoamylase split these smaller sugar particles to release glucose (Whitcomb and Lowe, 2007). α-glucosidase is also a key enzyme; its inhibitors slow down sugar absorption, which decreases postprandial plasma sugar levels and blocks postprandial hyperglycemia (Kumar et al., 2011).

Most diabetes and cancer deaths are linked to modifiable lifestyle and environmental factors, such as obesity, poor diet and physical inactivity. Lifestyle and environmental factors including tobacco, obesity, alcohol and low levels of fruits, vegetables and exercise (Mingyang and Edward, 2015). Immune status, smoking habits and number of sexual partners are all factors that can influence the progression of an HPV infection to CC03 (Nainakshi et al., 2019). Common CC03 symptoms include vaginal bleeding that's different from normal pattern such as bleeding after sex, between periods or after menopause or changes in vaginal discharge, discomfort in lower back and lower tummy (Emma et al., 2012). BC04 symptoms can include a new lump or thickening, alteration in breast structure, nipple discharge, armpit swelling, skin changes like dimpling and redness (Alison et al., 2005). CRC05 symptoms included altered bowel habits, rectal bleeding, abdominal pain, weight loss, fatigue and a feeling of incomplete emptying (Margaret et al., 2011). PC06 often lacks early symptoms, with signs typically appearing at a more advanced stage including jaundice, abdominal pain, loss of appetite, vomiting, nausea, weight loss and sometimes new onset of type 2 diabetes (Jonathan et al., 2020).

The pathogenesis of CC03 is driven by persistent high-risk HPV infection, in which the viral onco-proteins E6 and E7 disrupt the function of the tumor suppressor proteins p53 and pRB which leads to unchecked cell proliferation and the development of abnormal cervical cells (Xulelian et al., 2018). BC04 arises from uncontrollable breast cell growth and division, which is triggered by genetic mutations. Oncogenes are mutated versions of normal genes that fuel cell growth. For instance, when the HER2 proto-oncogene is overactive due to mutation, the resulting oncogene (HER2-positive) signals breast cells to divide and multiply uncontrollably (Melisa et al., 2023). CRC05 progresses via one of three main molecular pathways including Chromosomal Instability (CIN), Microsatellite Instability (MSI) and the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP), each characterized by distinct genetic alterations, leading to a heterogeneous disease with diverse clinical behaviors and treatment responses (Adria et al., 2024). PC06 forms tumors when cells in the pancreatic ducts develop genetic mutations that cause uncontrolled growth. Oncogenes activation (like KRAS), tumor suppressor genes inactivation (CDKN2A, TP53 and SMAD4) and signaling pathways dysregulation (like EGFR) are key mechanisms (Thomas et al., 2014).

Piper nigrum L., (PN01) member of Piperaceae and Syzygium aromaticum (SA02) member of Myrtaceae family; are the most commonly used spices, containing several beneficial phytochemicals with biological potential against chronic disorders like diabetes, obesity and multiple cancers (Parthasarathy et al., 2008). Piper nigrum L., (PN01) is routinely used condiments worldwide because of their countless advantages on human health. PN01 and SA02 contains alkaloids, flavonoids, glycosides, phenols and terpenes (Luca et al., 2023; Rubab et al., 2021; Neveu et al., 2010; William et al., 2004). PN01 possesses antibacterial, anti-diabetic and anticancer activity (Blessy and Gopinath, 2015). The secondary metabolites of SN02 are medicinally used in many countries as antimicrobial, analgesic, carcino-protective and sedative (Abd et al., 2014; Khan and Ahmad, 2012). Phytosterol found naturally in plants have major benefit is to reduce the blood cholesterol level and prevent the human body from coronary cardiac disease (Ostlund, 2002). Piperine, the active component of PN01, significantly reduces cell viability and colony formation in HeLa cells (Buranrat and Benjaporn, 2022).

GCMS spectrometry is a methodological approach which connects the characteristics of GC and MS to recognize the distinct phytochemicals from the extract (Skoog et al., 2007). This method offers high reliability and reproducibility, allowing for robust qualitative and quantitative analysis to be performed consistently across different labs and instruments. GC-MS is a well-established analytical tool for identifying unknown compounds by comparing their mass spectra, generated from unique fragmentation patterns, with reference spectra from spectral libraries. Gas chromatography can isolate vaporous and semi-vaporescent mixtures with significant constancy, however inadequate for their recognition. MS can give almost complete particulars of structure of maximum combination in a manner that they could be truly recognized, but it cannot isolate these immediately (Hussain and Maqbool, 2014).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals

All reagents and chemicals were of research grade chemicals and acquired by Sigma Aldrich, Merck. Glucoxidase kit was bought from the Madar Diagnostic which contain reagent with standard solution for testing of glucoamylase enzyme.

Plant material extraction

Piper nigrum dried fruit and Syzygium aromaticum dried flower buds were purchased from the herbal market of Karachi, Pakistan. After being authenticated by Prof. Dr. Mohtasheem Ul Hassan, Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan, P. nigrum dried fruits and S. aromaticum flower buds were cleaned by removal of extraneous particles and converted into powdered form by using a grinder. 10 g of PN01 and SA02 powdered spices were soaked into100 mL methanol in separate glass container for 20 days.0.1g/mL PN01 and SA02 extracts used for GCMS assay and then stored in airtight glass container and stored at room temperature. While, 20 g PN01 and SA02 spices powdered were macerated in 200 mL phosphate buffer solution of neutral pH for three days at room temperature. Phosphate buffer is used instead of solvents because it maintains the optimal physiological pH required for activity and stability of enzyme. These 10% phosphate buffer extracts (0.1 g/mL) were used in enzyme inhibitory assays at different parameters, including time interval, temperature, days, and pH. While, Performance was done in the research laboratory of the Department of Pharmacognosy and the Department of Biochemistry, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Ethical statement

This article does not use any human participant or animal for secondary metabolites analysis.

Procedure for phytochemical recognition by GC-MS analysis

The compound identification of both spices' methanol extracts was done by observation of their MS division pattern with those saved in the digital library. GC-MS was performed on Agilent equipment 5975 series. Capillary column zebronzebron-5 containing 30 mx320 µmx0.25 µm film central width was utilized. Unadulterated carrier gas helium was employed at 1.5 mL/min flow rate and 44.635 cm/sec average velocity. 50ºC was the starting temperature automated to rise to 200ºC and later 300ºC for 20 min then leave it for 1:1202 min. Leave in solvent for 5 min, and scan time 200 ms. The phytochemical in both extracts were recognize by the retention times of every component, breakage design and MS feature supported by employing National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST) Liberary. Quardapole detector employed for component recognition (Patil and Jadhay, 2014).

Glucoamylase inhibitory assay

Different parameters for glucoamylase activity in the presence of PN01 and SA02 extracts were performed. The glucoxidase kit was used with some modification with glucose as a standard. Various parameters of glucoamylase inhibition were determined by performing the enzyme and extract assay after different time intervals, including 10, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min., pH 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9; days 1, 3, 6, and 9; and temperatures of 27ºC and 37ºC. Readings were read by using a UV spectrophotometer at 546 nm using glucose as a standard (Kim et al., 2022). Standard glucose curve is present in supplementary file. Two-way ANOVA is used for statistical analysis. One glucoamylase unit is defined as “The amount of enzyme that breaks down starch to release1.0 µmol of glucose per minute in a pH 7.0 buffer.” 1 unit of plant extract inhibition activity was described as “the amount of inhibitor that cuts glucoamylase activity down by 1 unit.”

The % inhibition of glucoamylase was calculated by using the following equation:

% inhibition = 100 - Ra

Where: At = absorbance of test, Ac = absorbance of control, Sc = standard concentration, As = absorbance of standard, IU = inhibitory unit, Rs = reducing sugar, Ra = residual activity, TU = test unit.

RESULTS

GCMS analysis

Structures of phytochemicals recognized by GCMS analysis of PN01 extract present in spectra’s available in supplementary file, which identified a total of 16 bioactive phytochemicals. Phytochemicals identified on GC-MS was based on their chemical structure, chemical formula, molecular weight, peak area, retention time and retention index. The most abundant compounds included caryophylline (100%), bicyclohexane,4-methylene-1-(1-methylethyl) (62.04%), d-limonene (53.41%), and piperine (24.82%), While a total of 14 phytochemicals were detected from the SA02 extract present in supplementary file, the chemical composition includes eugenol (100%), caryophylline (31.39%), and phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl), acetate (23.76%), along with smaller amounts of other secondary metabolites.

Glucoamylase

PN01 showed stronger glucoamylase inhibition at 60 min (91.59 ± 0.99), day 3 (89.94 ± 1.23), 37ºC temperature (72.71 ± 6.76) and at pH 5 (65.60 ± 4.56) while, SA02 exerted stronger glucoamylase inhibition at 37ºC (96.05 ± 1.27), 60 min (92.39 ± 2.52), pH 7 (35.02 ± 41.51) and day 3(91.36 ± 4.39) (Figures 1-4 and Tables 1-4).

Figure 1: Effect of temperature and extract on glucoamylase.
Figure 2: Effect of time and extract on glucoamylase.
Figure 3: Effect of pH and extract on glucoamylase.
Figure 4: Effect of days and extract on glucoamylase.
Table 1: Effect of temperature and plant extract on glucoamylase inhibition.
TempExtractMean InhibitionStandard InhibitionnStandard Error InhibitionMean Standard
27PN42.192.23631.29142.19 ± 2.24
27SA3.210.90630.5233.21 ± 0.91
37PN72.716.75533.972.71 ± 6.76
37SA96.051.2730.73396.05 ± 1.27
Table 2: Effect of time and plant extract on glucoamylase inhibition.
TimeExtractMean InhibitionStandard InhibitionnStandard Error InhibitionMean Standard
10PN28.161.7631.0228.16 ± 1.76
10SA32.4129.89317.2632.41 ± 29.89
30PN4811.0436.3848.00 ± 11.04
30SA44.720.91312.0744.70 ± 20.91
60PN91.590.9930.5791.59 ± 0.99
60SA92.392.5231.4592.39 ± 2.52
90PN90.550.3930.2290.55 ± 0.39
90SA91.2170.0330.0291.22 ± 0.03
120PN59.34323.2313.3959.34 ± 23.20
120SA61.7330.0630.0361.73 ± 0.06
Table 3: Effect of pH and plant extract on glucoamylase inhibition.
pHExtractMean InhibitionStandard InhibitionnStandard Error InhibitionMean Standard
5PN65.64.5632.6365.60 ± 4.56
5SA33.618.14310.4733.60 ± 18.14
6PN62.343.331.962.34 ± 3.30
6SA19.1317.51310.1119.13 ± 17.51
7PN51.740.1330.0751.74 ± 0.13
7SA35.0241.51323.9735.02 ± 41.51
8PN35.54231.1535.54 ± 2.00
8SA7.452.3931.387.45 ± 2.39
9PN54.713.863854.70 ± 13.86
9SA7.474.1632.47.47 ± 4.16
Table 4: Effect of days and plant extract on αamylase inhibition.
DaysExtractMean InhibitionStandard InhibitionnStandard Error InhibitionMean Standard
1PN66.7316.1339.3166.73 ± 16.13
1SA87.751.7731.0287.75 ± 1.77
3PN89.941.2330.7189.94 ± 1.23
3SA91.364.3932.5391.36 ± 4.39
6PN825.733.2982.00 ± 5.70
6SA87.53130.5887.53 ± 1.00
9PN60.596.3933.6960.59 ± 6.39
9SA87.552.8431.6487.55 ± 2.84

DISCUSSION

Currently rate of CC03 is increasing internationally which is hazardous and seeking attention to focus on research studies for a novel drug obtained from natural sources for their treatment. Recently researchers are seeking new digestive enzymes inhibitors from plants to employ against CC03, diabetes and hypertension (Govindappa et al., 2020). Various secondary metabolites were identified in the GC fraction of the PN01 and SA02 methanol extracts such as piperine, eugenol, caryophylline, caryophylline oxide, hexadeconic acid, oleic acid etc. which are major antioxidant, anticancer and antihypertensive agents (Ali et al., 2021; Oghogho and Nimenibo, 2019; Sumner, 2000). PN01 and SA02 extracts phytochemicals investigation shown phenolic compounds and their derivatives presence showed vital role as anticancer agent (Tariq et al, 2017; Adefegha and Oboh, 2013).

Eugenol and volatile oils of SA02 possess anticancer property against HeLa and MCF-7 cell lines for CCO3 and BC04 treatment (Arunava et al., 2018; Parinnesh et al., 2014). Seven amide alkaloids including piperine which is major component of PN01, its introduction desensitized CC03 HeLa/PTX cells to paclitaxel, its sensitize mechanism was investigated. Piperine was combined with paclitaxel, the combination treatment promoted cell apoptosis by down regulating phospho-Akt and Mcl-1, this sensitization mechanism was investigated, where piperine showed more significant sensitization effect (Zhoufan et al., 2019). BC04 study showed that administering eugenol and piperine directly into the tumor (intratumoral administration) significantly slowed or stopped the growth of TNBC xenografts in mice that lacked a fully functional immune system (Shailima et al., 2025; Anna et al., 2015). CRC05 studies found that eugenol, volatile oils and piperine reduce β-catenin's movement into the nucleus, providing mechanistic insight into its inhibitory action on the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (Thunyatorn et al., 2025; Gracielle et al., 2020). Eugenol and piperine can stop the PC06 cells growth by halting their cell cycle progression and inhibiting survival (Hyun et al., 2024; Ji et al., 2021). α-pinene is monocyclic terpenoid which possess anticancer property by suppressing HeLa cell growth, causing cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase and inducing apoptosis, this observation of pro-apoptotic proteins upregulation and anti-apoptotic protein down regulation revealed that α-pinene activates the intrinsic apoptotic pathway (Xiaosu et al., 2022). Eugenol and α-pinene can be a potential therapeutic agent against BC04 because it inhibit BC04 cell growth and proliferation by decreasing miR-21 expression and increasing the tumor suppressor PTEN (Phosphatase and tensin homolog) expression. This modulation of gene expression leads to a reduction in BC04 cell invasion (Ahmad et al., 2025; Muhammad et al., 2024). α-pinene inhibitory effect on HT-29 colon cancer cell growth stems from reduced cell viability, increased apoptosis and the blocking of the PI3K/AKT pathway (Sara et al., 2025). In vitro studies of PC06 revealed that α-pinene prevented cell death and decreased cytokine production in pancreatic acinar cells that were artificially damaged by cerulean (Gi et al., 2012).

Copaene is a tricyclic sesquiterpene found in PN01 and SA02, research work revealed that it possesses antioxidant, anticancer and antigenotoxic activity (Turkez et al, 2014). This research investigated the anticancer potential of myrcene by evaluating their effects on cell lines (HeLa and HDFa) through cytotoxicity, proliferation, migration and morphology analysis (Luca et al., 2023). Studies showed that limonene (96.60%), with minor components (α-pinene, bicyclohexane, β-pinene, β-myrcene, 3-carene and o-cymene) possess the highest inhibitory activity against HepG2, MCF-7 and HeLa cells (Worachot et al., 2022). α-pinene, 3-carene, d-limonene and β-myrcene in BC04 showed the significant inactivation of TNFα-induced NF-κB (Jeong et al., 2015). α-pinene, α-phellandrene, δ-3-carene and d-limonene revealed cytotoxic activity in lung carcinoma (H460), CC03 (HeLa) and CRC05 (HCT116) underin vitro conditions (Emir et al., 2024). Beta-caryophyllene triggers apoptosis while suppressing proliferation and metastasis by modulating multiple cellular pathways. The anticancer activity is driven by ROS induction and JAK1/STAT activation. D-limonene exerts its anticancer effects by increasing the expression of autophagy-linked genes, Bax and caspase 3, while decreasing cyclin D1 and Bcl-2 expression. These compounds exhibit synergistic activity when combined with anticancer drugs, suggesting their promise as novel cancer-fighting agents (Gbadebo et al., 2025).

Research has shown that PN01’s β-myrcene is a potent antimicrobial, anti-obesity, and gastroprotective agent (Bonamin et al., 2014). Piperine has the potential to treat diabetes through hydrolytic enzymes inhibition (Elisa et al., 2021). Caryophylline inhibits alpha glucoamylase, which is found in PN01 and SA02, possess anti-diabetic, and antioxidant property (Oghogho and Nimenibo, 2019). According to research, caryophyllene oxide, which is found in PN01 and SA02 has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties. It inhibits α-glucoamylase, which causes lymphoma and neuroblastoma cells to undergo apoptosis (Jaradat et al., 2020). Glucosidase enzymes significantly reduced blood sugar levels in an in vitro study of secondary metabolites (Aljarah and Hameed, 2018).

Results of PN01 and SA02 showed significant glucoamylase inhibition at various parameters. SA02 showed the highest glucoamylase inhibition at 37ºC temperature (96.05 ± 1.27), on day 3 (91.36 ± 4.39), at 60 min (92.39 ± 2.52), and at pH 7.00 (35.02 ± 41.51). Furthermore, PN01 exerted maximum glucoamylase inhibition at 60 min (91.59 ± 0.99), day 3.0 (89.94 ± 1.23), 37ºC temperature (72.71 ± 6.76), and at pH 5.00 (65.60 ± 4.56). Both plants possess glucoamylase inhibitory potential by hydrophobic and charge interaction with amino acid residue, phenols and flavonoids in PN01 inhibit glucoamylase, lowering blood glucose levels and aiding in the treatment of diabetes (Elisa et al., 2021; Stephen et al., 2015). By interfering with the active enzyme site and preventing the breakdown of carbohydrates into glucose, eugenol, and polyphenols found in SA02 inhibit glucoamylase, which lowers postprandial hyperglycemia by delaying the absorption of carbohydrates from the gastrointestinal tract (Stephen and Ganiyu, 2012).

The glucoamylase enzyme present in the intestinal wall has an optimal temperature of the human body, which is around 37.5ºC; above this temperature can destroy the enzyme structure, so it gives the best result at human body temperature (Kumar and Satyanaryana, 2009). PN01 and SA02 extracts exert hydrolytic enzyme inhibition under varying durations; both extracts exhibited more glucoamylase inhibition at 60 min. Enzyme inhibition can be time dependent; some spices show powerful inhibition initially that decreases gradually, while others may have a delayed but prolonged effect. Both extracts result in glucoamylase enzymes inhibition on all days, but the highest inhibitory potential is achieved on day 3 (S. aromaticum) and day 6 (P. nigrum), it may be influenced by its concentration or the presence of its chemical constituents. This inhibition aids in postprandial glucose level management and potentially helps in controlling blood sugar level (Elisa et al., 2021; Stephen and Ganiyu, 2012; Sudhir and Mohan, 2002). Both extracts showed maximum glucoamylase inhibition at pH 5 and minimum inhibition at pH 8 and 9. Maximum glucoamylase inhibition ranges between 4 and 6 pH; extremely high or low pH levels resulted in total loss of activity for most enzymes (Imran et al., 2012). Alpha glucoamylase enzyme digests the carbohydrates and postprandial glucose level in diabetic patients, so due to glucoamylase enzyme inhibition, postprandial hyperglycemia can be controlled, and hence the risk of diabetes (Navjot et al., 2021).

Both extracts exerted significant glucoamylase enzyme inhibition, but SA02 has more potential to inhibit glucoamylase than PN01 due to their high concentration of its phyto-constituents included alkaloids, volatile oil, phenol, and terpenes (monoterpenes, and sesquiterpenes). Especially eugenol, caryophylline and phenol present in SA02 interact effectively with the hydrolytic enzyme structures to inhibit their activity (Hafizah et al., 2016; Mnafgui et al., 2013).

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that PN01 and SA02 phytochemicals identified by GCMS will be advantageous in different field especially in medical and pharmaceuticals and greatly valuable for treatment of various type of cancer. Secondary metabolites ofPN01 and SA02 recognized by GCMS analysis, especially piperine, beta-myrcene, 3-carene, copaene, caryophylline and α-pinene have shown promising anticancer effects against CC03, BC04, CRC05, and PC06 cell lines in preclinical studies. Research has demonstrated that secondary metabolites of PN01 and SA02 can reduce tumor cell viability, induce apoptosis and inhibit migration in CC03, BC04, CRC05 and PC06. PN01 and SA02 exhibited glucoamylase enzymes inhibition, So, their extracts may be accounted for as economic and natural antidiabetic and antiobesity medicine to manage postprandial hyperglycemia by glucoamylase inhibitory potential and their ideal parameters. However, their application in clinical oncology and diabetic centers is limited due to a lack of human studies, bioavailability issues and potential drug interactions.

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

  1. Abd, E. A, M, Mesallamy, A, & Gerby, M. (2014). E; Awad, A. Anti-tumor, Antioxidant and the Phenolic Constituents of Clove Flower Buds. J Microb Biochem Technol. 10:s8-s007. https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.S8-007DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  2. Adefegha, S. (2013). A; Oboh, G. Phytochemistry and Mode of Action of Some Tropical Spices in the Management of Type-2 Diabetes and Hypertension. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 7(7), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPP12.014DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  3. Ahmad, M. N, Muhammad, T. S, Aimen, M, Waqas, A. K, & Muhammad, I. (2025). Et al. Eugenol: an Insight Into the Anticancer Perspective and Pharmacological Aspects. Food Science & Nutrition, 13(8), e70727. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.70727DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  4. Ali, T. Z, Tala, A. Z, & Khalid, R. H. (2021). Anticancer properties of Eugenol; A review. Molecules, 26(23), 7407. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26237407DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  5. Alison, B, Amanda, R, Caroline, B, & Myra, H. (2005). Understanding why women delay in seeking help for breast cancer symptoms. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 58(4), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.10.007DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  6. Aljarah, A. (2018). K; Hameed, I. H. in Vitro Anti-diabetic Properties of Methanolic Extract of Thymus Vulgaris Using Α-glucosidase and Α-amylase Inhibition Assay and Determination of Its Bioactive Chemical Compounds. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 9(3), 388–392. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2018.00241.3DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  7. Anna, L. (2015). G; Caroyln, D. D; Kimberly, M. S; Laurence, M; Henry, A. et Al. Piperine Inhibits the Growth and Motility of Triple-negative Breast Cancer Cells. Cancer Letters, 357(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2014.11.017DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  8. Arunava, D, Harshadha, K, & Dhinesh, K. (2018). S; Hari, R. K; Bindhu, J. Evaluation of Therapeutic Potential of Eugenol- a Natural Derivative of Syzygium Aromaticum on Cervical Cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Pre, 19(7), 1977–1985. https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.7.1977DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  9. Blessy, S, & Gopinath, P. (2015). Antibacterial activity of ethanolic extract of black pepper against clinical isolates of staphylococcus. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. Antibacterial Activity of Ethanolic Extract of Black Pepper Against Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus - Proquest, 7(11), 1015.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  10. Bonamin, F, & Mores, T. (2014). M; dos Santos, R.C; Kushima, H; Faria, F.M. Et Al. the Effect of a Minor Constituent of Essential Oil From Citrus Aurantium: the Role of Β-myrecene in Preventing Peptic Ulcer Disease. Chemico-biological Interactions, 212, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2014.01.009DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  11. Bray, F, Ferlay, J, Soerjomataram, I, Siegel, R, Torre, L, Jemal, & statistics, A. G. C. (2018). GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68(6), 394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  12. Buranrat, & Benjaporn (2022). Proliferative inhibition, apoptotic induction. Migratory Suppression of Piper Nigrum Extract on Hela Cervical Cell Line. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 84(5), 1210. https://doi.org/10.36468/pharmaceutical-sciences.1016DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  13. Canellas-S, Adria, Elena, S, & Eduard, B. (2024). Mechanism of metastatic colorectal cancer. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 21, 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-024-00934-zDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  14. De, A, Gracielle, C, & Luiz, F. (2020). S. O; Danilo, P; Harold, H. F; Ricardo, M. K et Al. Piperine Suppresses the Wnt/β-catenin Pathway and Has Anticancer Effects on Colorectal Cancer Cells. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 11681. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68574-2DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  15. Elisa, M-B, & Genesis, V. (2021). B-C; Alejandro, H- M; Vianey, D; Rocio, T-P et al. In Vitro Alpha Amylase and Alpha Glucosidase Enzyme Inhibition Andantioxidant Activity By Capsaicin and Piperine From Capsicum Chinense and Piper Nigrum Fruits. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 56(3), 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2020.1869477DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  16. Emir, H, Lamija, K, Suada, C, Merima, I, & Lejla, M. (2014). Et al. Anticancer Potential of Pink Pepper Fruit Essential Oil: Study on Human Cell Lines of Lung Cancer Carcinoma (h460), Cervical Adenocarcinoma (hela) and Colorectal Carcinoma (HCT116). Technologica Acta, 17(2), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.51558/2232-7568.2024.17.2.43DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  17. Emma, L. (2012). L; Alice, E. S; Jane, L; Debble, R-a; JO, W. What Do British Women Know About Cervical Cancer Symptoms and Risk Factors?. European Journal of Cancer, 48(16), 3001–3008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.05.004DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  18. Gbadebo, Ololade, S, Oke, Elizabeth, D, Ajibuwa, & Felix, A. (2025). Anticancer properties of beta-caryophylline and d-lemonene terpenes: A review. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 15(4), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.4103/apjtb.apjtb_7_25DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  19. Gi-Sang, B, Kyoung-Chel, P, Bok, S, C, IL-JOO, J, & MEE-OK, C. (2012). Protective effects of alpha pinene in mice with cerulean induced acute pancreatitis. Life Sciences, 91(17-18), 866–871.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  20. Govindappa, M, Lavanya, M, Aishwarya, P, Kavya, Pai, Lunked, P, & Hemashekhar, B. (2020). Et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Endophytic Fungi, Closporium Perangustum Mediated Silver Nanoparticles and Their Antioxidant, Anticancer and Nano-toxicological Study. Bionanoscience, 10(4), 928–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-020-00719-zDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  21. Hafizah, U. (2016). T; Raja, A.S; Aisha, A; Shazia, A. Chemical Composition and Antidiabetic Activity of Essential Oils Obtained From Two Spices (syzygium Aromaticum Andcuminum Cyminum). International Journal of Food Properties, 9(10), 2156–2164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2015.1110166DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  22. Haiyan, Z, Hui, L, Wenwen, Z, Zhaojun, S, Xiaoli, H, & Xueqiuong, Z. (2016). Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance in cervical cancer. National Center for Biotechnology Information, 10, 1885–1895. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S106412DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  23. Hussain, S. (2014). Z; Maqbool, K. GC-MS Principle, Technique and Its Application in Food Science. International Journal of Current Science, 13, 116–126.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  24. Hyun, H. K, & Suk, Y. (2024). L; Dae, H.L. Apoptosis of Pancreatic Cancer Cells After Co-treatment With Eugenol and Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand. Cancers, 16(17), 3092. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16173092DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  25. Imran, M, Asad, J. M, Gulfraz, M, Qureshi, R, & Gul, H. (2012). Glucoamylase production from aspergillus niger by using solid state fermentation process. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 44(6), 2103–2110.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  26. Jaradat, N, & Maharik, N. (2020). A; Abdallah, S; Shawahna, R; Mousa, A. Et Al. “nepeta Curviflora Essential Oil: Phytochemical Composition, Antioxidant, Anti-proliferative and Anti-migratory Efficacy Against Cervical Cancer Cells, and Α-glucosidase, Α-amylase and Porcine Pancreatic Lipase Inhibitory Activities.”. Industrial Crops and Products, 158, 112946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112946DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  27. Jeong-H, L, Kicheol, L, & DA, H. (2015). L; soon Young, S; Yeonjoong, Y; Young, H. L. Anti-invasive Effect of Beta-myrecene, a Component of the Essential Oil From Pinus Koraiensis Cones, in Metastatic MDA-MB-231 Human Breast Cancer Cells. Scientific Reports, 58(4), 563–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-015-0081-3DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  28. JI, H. (2021). J; JAE-H, R; HWA J, L. In Vitro Inhibition of Piper Nigrum and Piperine on Growth, Migration and Invasion of PANC- 1human Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Sage Journal Reviewer Gateway. 16(11):1934578x211057694. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X211057694DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  29. Jonathan, D, MD, Rishisurana, M. D, Juan, W. V, MD, Rachna, T. S, & MD (2020). Pancreatic cancer. The Lancet, 395(10242), 2008. –. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  30. Junjie, H, Veeleah, L, & Chun, H. (2021). N; Lin, Z; Jinqiu, Y; Xiang, Q. L. et Al. Worldwide Burden Of, Risk Factors for and Trends in Pancreatic Cancer. Gastronenterology, 160(3), 744–75. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.007DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  31. Kaefer, Chirstine, M, Milner, & John, A. (2008). The role of herbs and spices in cancer prevention. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 19(6), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2007.11.003DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  32. Khan, M. (2012). S. A; Ahmad, I. Biofilm Inhibition By Cymbopogon Citratus and Syzygium Aromaticum Essential Oils in the Strains of Candida Albicans. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 140(2), 416–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.01.045DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  33. Kim, R. H, Antonisamy, P, Kim, S. Y, Lee, G, & Ham, D. (2022). H; Kown, B. K. Inhibitory Effect of Amomum Villosum Water Extracts on Alpha Glucosidase Activity. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, Elesvier, 117, 101779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2021.101779DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  34. Kumar, P, & Satyanaryana, T. (2009). Microbial glucoamylases: Characteristics and application. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 29(3), 225–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388550903136076DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  35. Kumar, S, Narwal, S, Kumar, V, & Prakash, O. (2011). Α-glucosidase inhibitors from plants: A natural approach to treat diabetes. Pharmacognosy Reviews, 5(9), 19. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.79096DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  36. Luca, P, Francesca, V, Christian, B, Cecilia, O, & Romana, F. (2023). Et al. Myrecene: a Natural Compound Showing Anticancer Activity in Hela Cells. Molecules, 28(18), 6728. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28186728DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  37. Luca, S. (2023). V; Kittl, T; Minceva, M. Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Spices: a Systematic Study With Focus on Terpenes and Piperamides From Black Pepper (piper Nigrum L,). Food Chemistry, 406, 135090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135090DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  38. Madihalli, S. (2022). C; Abhijit, D; Mallappa, K. S. Introduction to Cancer and Treatment Approaches. Paclitaxel. 1–, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90951-8.00010-2DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  39. Margaret, A, Tom, G, Richard, D, N, Peter, R, & William, H. (2011). The diagnostic value of symptoms for colorectal cancer in primary care: A systematic review. British Journal of General Practice, 61(586), e231. –e243. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X572427DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  40. Mnafgui, K, Kaanich, F, Derbali, A, Hamden, K, Derbali, F, & Slama, S. (2013). Et al. Inhibition of Key Enzymes Related to Diabetes and Hypertension By Eugenol in Vitro and in Alloxan-induced Diabetic Rats. Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry, 119(5), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.3109/13813455.2013.822521DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  41. Muhammad, Y, Mahdi, A, Shana, A, Parisa, K, Elham, G, & Ghasem, F. G. B. (2024). Therapeutic potential of alpha pinene in breast cancer: Targeting MiR-21 and PTEN gene expression. Galen Medical Jounal, 13, e3613. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v13i.3613DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  42. Nainakshi, K, Nadiya, K, Sukhpal, K, & Sandhya, G. (2019). Risks factors of cervical cancer: A case-control study. Asian-pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 6(3), 308–314. https://doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_73_18DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  43. Navjot, K, Vanktesh, K, Surendra, K, & Nayak, P. (2021). W; Paranjit, K; Sanjeev, K. S. Alpha-amylase As Molecular Target for Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: a Comprehensive Review. Chemical Biology and Drug Design. Wiley, 98(4), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.13909DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  44. Neveu, V, Perez-Jimenez, J, Vos, F, Crespy, V, & Chaffaut, D. (2010). Et al. Phenol-explorer: an Online Comprehensive Database on Polyphenol Contents in Foods. Database. :bap024. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bap024DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  45. Nicoud, Melisa, B, D, & Monica, A. (2023). Taquez; Ignacio, O; Helena, A. S; Karina, F; Medina, Vanina A. Histaminergic System As a Promising Target for Breast Cancer Treatment. Scientific Report: Springer Nature Link. 385–, 414. https://doi.org/10.1007/16833_2022_104DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  46. Oghogho, O, & Nimenibo-UADIA, R. (2019). “Phytochemical screening, GC-MS analysis and in vitro inhibition of alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase activities by methanol extract of psidium guajava leaves and fractions.”. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(5).GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  47. Ostlund, R. (2002). E. JR. Phytosterols in Human Nutrition. Annual Review of Nutrition, 22(1), 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.020702.075220DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  48. Parthasarathy, V. (2008). A; Chempakam, B; Zachariah, T. J. Chemistry of Spices. Cabi. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845934057.0000DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  49. Parvinnesh, S. (2014). K; Raden, M. F; Ferry, F. S; Dimas, E. L; Rizky, A. Anticancer Potential of Syzygium Aromaticum in MCF-7 Humancancer Cell Lines. Pharmacognosy Res, 6(4), 350–354. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8490.138291DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  50. Pasqualino, F, Gabriele, C, Macro, G, Felice, P, & Raffaele, E. (2016). M. P; Francesco, C. Worldwide Burden of Colorectal Cancer: a Review. Updates in Surgery, 68(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0359-yDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  51. Patil, A, & Jadhav, V. (2014). GC-MS analysis of bioactive components from methanol leaf extract of toddalia asiatica (L.). Int. Pharm Sci Rev Res. Microsoft Word -, 04, 29. (1), 18–20.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  52. Rubab, A. (2021). K; Sivakumari, K; Rajesh, S; Mangaladevi, S; Kayalvizhi, S. Phytochemical Profiling of Selected Spices (ferula Asafetida, Piper Nigrum, Elettaria Cardamomum, Cinnamomum Aromaticum and Syzygium Aromaticum) Extract. International Journal of Zoology and Applied Biosciences, 6(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodoDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  53. Sara, S, Yasaman, Z, Elham, H, Reza, S, & Seyedeh, M. (2025). Exploring the effects of alpha-pinene on apoptosis induction in human colon cancer cells via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway: An in vitro study. Springer Nature Link, 26(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-025-00656-0DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  54. Shailima, R, Mugahed, A. A, Tae, H. O, & Baji, S. (2025). A review of six bioactive compounds from preclinical studies as potential breast cancer inhibitors. Molecular Biology Research, 52(1), 203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-025-10300-0DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  55. Singh, D, Vignat, J, Loraenzoni, V, Eslahi, M, Ginsburg, O, & Lauby-Secretan, B. (2020). Global estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2020: A baseline analysis of the WHO global cervical cancer elimination initiative. Lancet Global Health, 2023, 11. (2):e197-206.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  56. Skoog, D. (2007). A; Holler, F. J; Crouch, S. R. Instrumental Analysis. Brooks/ Cole, Cengage Learning Belmont. Microsoft Word - Vassar Main Doc.doc.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  57. Song, Mingyang, Giovannucci, & Edward, L. (2015). Cancer risk: Many factors contribute. Science, 347(6223), 728–729. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa6094DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  58. Stephen, A. (2012). A; Ganiyu, O. In Vitro Inhibition Activity of Polyphenol- Rich Extracts From Syzygium Aromaticum (l.) Merr. & Perry (clove) Buds Against Carbohydrate Hydrolyzing Enzymes Linked to Type 2 Diabetes and Fe2+ - Induced Lipid Peroxidation in Rat Pancreas. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 2(10), 774–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(12DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  59. Stephen, A. (2015). A; Ganiyu, O; Sunday, I. O; Kolawole, O. Alteration of Starch Hydrolyzing Enzyme Inhibitory Properties, Antioxidant Activities, and Phenolic Profile of Clove Buds (syzygium Aromaticum L.) By Cooking Duration. Food Science and Nutrition, 4(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.284DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  60. Sudhir, R, & Mohan, V. (2002). Postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Treat Endocrinology, 1(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200201020-00004DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  61. SUMNER, J. (2000). The natural history of medicinal plants. Timber Press. https://doi.org/10.5555/20003017295DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  62. Tariq, A, Sadia, S, Pan, K, Ullah, I, & Mussarat, S. (2017). Et al. “a Systematic Review on Ethnomedicines of Anti-cancer Plants.”. Phytotherapy Research, 31(2), 202–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5751DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  63. Thomas, K, Christine, S, Munish, A, Thrower, & Edwin, C. (2014). Risk factors for pancreatic cancer: Underlying mechanisms and potential targets. Frontiers in Physiology. 4-, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00415DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  64. Thunyatorn, Y, Weerakitt, Sunee, C, Sumet, K, & Ngampuk, T. (2025). Et al. The Effect of Ethanolic Extracts From S.aromaticum and S.nervosum on Antiproliferative Activity and Apoptosis in HCT116 and HT-29 Cells. Int J. Mol. Sci, 26(14), 6826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146826DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  65. Turkez, H, Togar, B, Tatar, A, Geyikoglu, F, & Hacimuftuoglu, A. (2014). Cytotoxic and cytogenetic effects of α-copaene on rat neuron and N2a neuroblastoma cell lines. Biologia, 69(7), 936–942. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-014-0393-5DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  66. Whitcomb, D. (2007). C; Lowe, M.E. Human Pancreatic Digestive Enzyme. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 52(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9589-zDOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  67. William, R. (2004). J; Spencer, J. P; Rice-evans, C. Flavonoids: Antioxidants Or Signaling Molecules?. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 36(7), 838–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.01.001DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  68. Worachot, S, Thipphiya, K, Benjaporn, B, Teeraporn, K, Nyuk, L. M, & Vijitra, L. (2022). Cytotoxicity and antiproliferative activity of essential oils from lemon, wild orange and petitgrain against MCF-7, HepG2 and HeLa cancer cells. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-napoca, 50(3), 12713. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha50312713DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  69. Xiaosu, H, Pei, Y, Wenqing, D, Chang, Z, & Qiuxiang, X. (2022). Et al. Α–pinene Inhibits the Growth of Cervical Cancer Cells Through Its Proapoptotic Activity By Regulating the Mir-34a-5p/bcl-2 Signaling Axis. Drug Development Research, 83(8), 1766–1776. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21994DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  70. Xuelian, W, Xiumin, H, & Youzhong, Z. (2018). Involvement of human papilloma viruses in cervical cancer. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02896DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  71. Zhoufan, X, Yulu, W, Jie, X, Jiachuan, L, & Jianqing, Y. (2019). Alkaloids from piper nigrum synergistically enhanced the effect of paclitaxel against Paclitaxel-Resistant cervical cancer cells through the downregulation of Mcl-1. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 6(18), 5159–5168. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b01320DOIGOOGLE SCHOLAR

Cite this article

SELECT FORMAT

Asif, S. T., Hassan, M. U., Qader, S. A. U., & Jamshed, M. (2026). Metabolomics Insight into PN01 and SA02: Anticancer Efficacy and Antidiabetic Enzyme Inhibition. Journal of AI, Software & Web Technologies, 1(1), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.5530/pres.20270197